<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Participatory Action Research &amp; Organizational Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://participaction.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>...an approach to organizational transformation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:09:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What is PAR? by grahamdover</title>
		<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com/whatpar/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>grahamdover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://participaction.wordpress.com/?page_id=3#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your question - sorry for the delay.  I think the best page to check out is &lt;a href=&quot;http://participaction.wordpress.com/whatpar/the-r-in-par/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; - where I directly tackle this question. I hope this is helpful.  Cheers, Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your question &#8211; sorry for the delay.  I think the best page to check out is <a href="http://participaction.wordpress.com/whatpar/the-r-in-par/" rel="nofollow">here</a> &#8211; where I directly tackle this question. I hope this is helpful.  Cheers, Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is PAR? by ugbaji emmanuel</title>
		<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com/whatpar/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>ugbaji emmanuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://participaction.wordpress.com/?page_id=3#comment-74</guid>
		<description>what is the difference between conventional research and PRM/PAR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the difference between conventional research and PRM/PAR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scaling up: Large scale participatory projects by grahamdover</title>
		<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/scale/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>grahamdover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://participaction.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Hi - that&#039;s a really good question and I need to search around.  From my limited knowledge PAR seems more orientated towards assisting a marginalized group to draw on their collective experiences and take action.  Ultimately, that must mean an engagement with different stakeholders - although I suspect there would be a range of different approaches here as to the degree these different interests engage with a PAR process (eg very peripheral to integral).  
A google search on PAR and multi-stakeholders took me to &lt;a href=&quot;http://tiny.cc/zZyvh&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one resource&lt;/a&gt; that might be worth a quick scan.  I think I would start looking at issues that demand multi-stakeholder approaches (eg crisis in a community around illegal drug use) and how PAR might be used as a vehicle to bring different interests together.  A few other links on Google - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4803e/y4803e07.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;forest interest groups&lt;/a&gt; -  and &lt;a href=&quot;http://rmportal.net/tools/biodiversity-conservation-tools/putting-conservation-in-context-cd/participatory-approaches-resources/1-13.pdf/view&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;conservation &lt;/a&gt;. 
Is there an area that you are particularly interested in?  Sorry not to be more helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; that&#8217;s a really good question and I need to search around.  From my limited knowledge PAR seems more orientated towards assisting a marginalized group to draw on their collective experiences and take action.  Ultimately, that must mean an engagement with different stakeholders &#8211; although I suspect there would be a range of different approaches here as to the degree these different interests engage with a PAR process (eg very peripheral to integral).<br />
A google search on PAR and multi-stakeholders took me to <a href="http://tiny.cc/zZyvh" rel="nofollow">one resource</a> that might be worth a quick scan.  I think I would start looking at issues that demand multi-stakeholder approaches (eg crisis in a community around illegal drug use) and how PAR might be used as a vehicle to bring different interests together.  A few other links on Google &#8211; <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4803e/y4803e07.htm" rel="nofollow">forest interest groups</a> &#8211;  and <a href="http://rmportal.net/tools/biodiversity-conservation-tools/putting-conservation-in-context-cd/participatory-approaches-resources/1-13.pdf/view" rel="nofollow">conservation </a>.<br />
Is there an area that you are particularly interested in?  Sorry not to be more helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scaling up: Large scale participatory projects by Annasinte</title>
		<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/scale/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Annasinte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://participaction.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m struggling to find further information or examples of PAR where there has been a scaling up to multiple stakeholders, rather than a defined group or groups of people. Do you have any suggestions of examples where this has been applied?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m struggling to find further information or examples of PAR where there has been a scaling up to multiple stakeholders, rather than a defined group or groups of people. Do you have any suggestions of examples where this has been applied?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scaling up: Large scale participatory projects by kunda zimba</title>
		<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/scale/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>kunda zimba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://participaction.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-52</guid>
		<description>i think this is a well done article and i  have learnt alot from this information regarding scaling. thank u very much Sarah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this is a well done article and i  have learnt alot from this information regarding scaling. thank u very much Sarah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scaling up: Large scale participatory projects by grahamdover</title>
		<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/scale/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>grahamdover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://participaction.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sarah - appreciate your comment.  Will definitely check out your blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sarah &#8211; appreciate your comment.  Will definitely check out your blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating PAR by grahamdover</title>
		<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com/whatpar/evaluating-par/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>grahamdover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://participaction.wordpress.com/?page_id=62#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Thanks David - really appreciate the link - will check it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David &#8211; really appreciate the link &#8211; will check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evaluating PAR by David Reid</title>
		<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com/whatpar/evaluating-par/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>David Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://participaction.wordpress.com/?page_id=62#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Herr and Anderson have an excellent discussion of validity in their book The Action Research Dissertation. They argue for a plural concept of validities for AR: outcome, process, democratic, catalytic, dialogic types. 

The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty
By Kathryn Herr, Gary L. Anderson
Published by SAGE, 2005</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herr and Anderson have an excellent discussion of validity in their book The Action Research Dissertation. They argue for a plural concept of validities for AR: outcome, process, democratic, catalytic, dialogic types. </p>
<p>The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty<br />
By Kathryn Herr, Gary L. Anderson<br />
Published by SAGE, 2005</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scaling up: Large scale participatory projects by Sarah Fraser</title>
		<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/scale/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://participaction.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised there was reluctance to share and to become an instant community.  When we want projects we help the leaders by giving them project manager skills.  I believe the same goes for creating communities; there is a set of skills in assessing, creating, nurturing and sustaining the type of relationships that were wanted here. 
I think your questions have covered some of the key issues as well.
Some of these I&#039;ve covered in my blog on www.spreadgoodpractice.blogspot.com

Sarah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised there was reluctance to share and to become an instant community.  When we want projects we help the leaders by giving them project manager skills.  I believe the same goes for creating communities; there is a set of skills in assessing, creating, nurturing and sustaining the type of relationships that were wanted here.<br />
I think your questions have covered some of the key issues as well.<br />
Some of these I&#8217;ve covered in my blog on <a href="http://www.spreadgoodpractice.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spreadgoodpractice.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>Sarah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tyranical participation: The need for an institutional perspective by grahamdover</title>
		<link>http://participaction.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/tyranical/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>grahamdover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://participaction.wordpress.com/?p=116#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bill for your encouragement!  Will check out the book and would always welcome further comments about any aspect of the blog - especially where you think I am really missing the point!  

Many thanks, Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bill for your encouragement!  Will check out the book and would always welcome further comments about any aspect of the blog &#8211; especially where you think I am really missing the point!  </p>
<p>Many thanks, Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
