Posted on July 14, 2008 by grahamdover
The issue of quality in participatory research is often difficult to nail. Hilary Bradbury and Peter Reason* propose that the answer to the question – are we [researchers] doing good work? – is answered by considering quality in relation to five key issues:
relationships;
practical outcomes;
extended ways of knowing;
purpose;
and enduring consequence.
Filed under: PAR researchers, participation challenges, validity | Tagged: knowledge, participation, praxis, quality, research | Leave a Comment »
Posted on July 11, 2008 by grahamdover
Of all the articles I have read so far, an article by Orlando Fals Borda* is one that has probably impacted me the most. Why? Fals Borda articulates a motivation and vision behind PAR in such a way that a researcher considering PAR may find disconcerting. A researcher that engages in PAR, in Fals Borda’s [...]
Filed under: PAR researchers, definition, participation, politics | Tagged: Fals Borda, knowledge, movement, praxis, social change, vivencia | Leave a Comment »
Posted on July 8, 2008 by grahamdover
Over the last few weeks I have been grappling with some of the tensions associated with PAR – in particular how “outsiders”, such as academic researchers, can engage with “insiders” , local participants, in ways that somehow meet their often diverse needs. One model that I have found helpful is by Max Elden and Morten [...]
Filed under: PAR researchers, participation challenges | Tagged: cogenerative, dialogue, frames, knowledge, local theory, research | Leave a Comment »